SAFETY OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS (PTS) WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS (RA) TREATED WITH FILGOTINIB (FIL) IN FILOSOPHY: INTERIM RESULTS FROM A PROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

BackgroundConsideration is needed when using Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors to treat RA in pts aged ≥65 years or those with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. The JAK1 preferential inhibitor FIL was generally well tolerated in clinical trials[1];safety has not been determined in a real-world setting.ObjectivesTo report baseline characteristics and up to 6-month safety data from the first 480 pts treated with FIL in the FILOSOPHY study (NCT04871919), and in two mutually exclusive subgroups based on age and CV risk.MethodsFILOSOPHY is an ongoing, phase 4, non-interventional, European study of pts with RA who have been prescribed FIL for the first time and in accordance with the product label in daily practice. Baseline characteristics and the incidence of select adverse events (AEs) are assessed in pts aged ≥65 years and/or with ≥1 CV risk factor (Table 1), and in those aged <65 years with no CV risk factors.ResultsAs of the end of June 2022, 480 pts had been treated: 441 received FIL 200 mg and 39 received FIL 100 mg. Of the 480 pts, 148 (30.8%) were aged ≥65 years;332 (69.2%) were aged <65 years. In total, 86 (17.9%) were former smokers, 81 (16.9%) were current smokers and 203 (42.3%) were non-smokers (data were missing for 110 pts [22.9%]). In addition to smoking, the most frequent CV risk factors included a history of hypertension (32.3%), a history of dyslipidemia (10.2%) and a family history of myocardial infarction (8.5%;Table 1).23 pts (4.8%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. Of the 354 pts aged ≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk factor, infections affected 64 pts (18.1%), 34 (9.6%) had COVID-19, 2 (0.6%) had herpes zoster, and cardiac disorders (angina pectoris, atrial fibrillation, palpitations and tachycardia) affected 5 pts (1.4%);no cases of malignancies were observed. In the subgroup aged <65 years and with no CV risk factors (n=126), infections occurred in 18 pts (14.3%) (9 [7.1%] had COVID-19;3 [2.4%] had herpes zoster) and malignancies (myeloproliferative neoplasm) affected 1 pt (0.8%);no pts had cardiac disorders. There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in either subgroup.ConclusionIn this interim analysis of FILOSOPHY, no unexpected safety signals emerged at up to 6 months. Although infections and cardiac disorders affected a numerically greater proportion of pts aged ≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk vs those aged <65 years with no CV risk, longer follow-up on a broader cohort is necessary to further characterize the safety of FIL in different groups of pts with RA.Reference[1]Winthrop K, et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:184–92Table 1.Baseline characteristics and CV risk factorsBaseline demographics/CV risk factorsAll FIL-treated pts (N=480)≥65 years or with ≥1 CV risk factor (n=354)<65 years and no CV risk factor (n=126)*Female sex, n (%)351 (73.1)252 (71.2)99 (78.6)Age, years, mean (SD)57.6 (11.5)60.4 (10.8)49.6 (9.6)Rheumatoid factor positive, n (%)†228 (47.5)167 (47.2)61 (48.4)Anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive, n (%)‡243 (50.6)176 (49.7)67 (53. 2)Body mass index, kg/m2, mean (SD)27.6 (5.7) n=43728.0 (5.4) n=33126.3 (6.4) n=106RA disease duration, years, mean (SD)10.4 (9.4) n=47810.5 (9.5) n=35310.0 (8.8) n=125Tender joint count 28, mean (SD)8.6 (6.9) n=4578.7 (7.1) n=3408.3 (6.3) n=117Swollen joint count 28, mean (SD)5.6 (5.2) n=4525.7 (5.4) n=3365.4 (4.4) n=116Former smoker, n (%)§86 (17.9)86 (24.3)0Current smoker, n (%)§81 (16.9)81 (22.9)0Non-smoker, n (%)§203 (42.3)130 (36.7)73 (57.9)Family history of myocardial infarction, n (%)41 (8.5)41 (11.6)0Medical history of: n (%) CV disease33 (6.9)33 (9.3)0 Diabetes35 (7.3)35 (9.9)0 Dyslipidemia49 (10.2)49 (13.8)0 Hypertension155 (32.3)155 (43.8)0 Ischemic CNS  vascular disorders11 (2.3)11 (3.1)0 Peripheral vascular disease17 (3.5)17 (4.8)0*Includes 53 pts with missing smoking status data who were aged <65 years with no other CV risk factors.†Missing/unknown in 154 pts;‡Missing in 153 pts;§Smoking status data missing in 110 pts (22.9%).AcknowledgementsWe thank the physicia s and patients who participated in this study. The study was funded by Galapagos NV, Mechelen, Belgium. Publication coordination was provided by Fabien Debailleul, PhD, of Galapagos NV. Medical writing support was provided by Debbie Sherwood, BSc, CMPP (Aspire Scientific, Bollington, UK), and funded by Galapagos NV.Disclosure of InterestsPatrick Verschueren Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Roularta, Consultant of: Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Nordic Pharma, Sidekick Health, Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Pfizer, Jérôme Avouac Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: BMS, Fresenius Kabi, Novartis, Pfizer, Karen Bevers Grant/research support from: Galapagos, Susana Romero-Yuste Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, BMS, Lilly, Pfizer, Consultant of: Sanofi, Lilly, Grant/research support from: Lilly, MSD, Roberto Caporali Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Thomas Debray Consultant of: Biogen, Galapagos, Gilead, Francesco De Leonardis Employee of: Galapagos, James Galloway Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: AstraZeneca, Celgene, Gilead, Janssen, Medicago, Novavax, Pfizer, Monia Zignani Shareholder of: Galapagos, Employee of: Galapagos, Gerd Rüdiger Burmester Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Chugai, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi.

AVASCULAR NECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL HEAD – NOT TO BE OVERLOOKED SEQUELA AFTER COVID 19 INFECTION

BackgroundCOVID 19 infection could lead to different sequelae in survivors, known as post-COVID or long COVID 19 syndromes. Some of them are thought to be due to the thrombophylic changes observed in COVID 19 infection, but some are thought to be caused by the administrated (especially high dose) corticosteroid treatment. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVNFH) is a multifactorial disease which leads to compromised vascular supply, ischemia and finally necrosis of the femoral head. As corticosteroids usage and thrombophylic states are among the main known risk factors for the development AVNFH [1], it could be presumed that the frequency of this disease will increase with the COVID 19 pandemic. The exact corticosteroid dose needed for the development of AVNFH is not clear, but it has been stated that a higher daily dose and a larger total cumulative dose increase substantially the risk for the development of osteonecrosis [2].ObjectivesTo describe in detail the characteristics of AVNFH diagnosed in patients after COVID 19 infection.MethodsThe study was done in a tertiary university rheumatological clinic. Data was extracted from the records of patients who have been referred to the clinic because of hip pain between June and December 2022. Inclusion criteria were: - a new onset of uni-or bilateral hip pain that started after a documented COVID 19 infection;and an MRI scan of the hip joints showing osteonecrosis of one or both femoral heads. Exclusion criteria were the presence of hip pain prior to the COVID 19 infection, anamnesis of traumatic injuries of the hips or pelvis, personal history of hypercoagulable states.ResultsNine patients (4 women and 5 men) with an average age 59.1 years (range 38-72) were included in the study. Four patients had been diagnosed with bilateral and five – with unilateral AVNFH, thus 13 hip joints were analysed in total (8 left and 5 right sided). The mean time lap between the COVID 19 infection and the start of the hip pain was 26.2 weeks (range 10-48 weeks). All patients had limited and painful movement in their symptomatic hip(s), especially internal rotation and four of the patients had also elevated CRP levels (mean 11.7 mg/L). The stage of the AVNFH was evaluated according to the Ficat-Arlet classification (0-IV stage). In four hips the AVNFH was stage I, five hips were classified as stage II and the remaining four joints - as stage III. All symptomatic hip joints exhibited effusion/synovitis on both ultrasound examination and the corresponding MRI scan. It should be noted that the presence of hip effusion was found to be related with a worse prognosis in AVNFH [1]. In three patients the amount of the effusion required arthrocentesis and fluid aspiration. The analysis of the joint fluid was consistent with a degenerative disease (i.e., low WBC count with predominant lymphocytes and no crystals). All patients included in our study had received corticosteroids during their COVID19 infection, while 6 of the patients had also been hospitalized due to more severe disease. According to the patients' documentation, the mean cumulative dose of the received corticosteroids was 936.2 mg prednisolone equivalent per patient (range 187-2272 mg).ConclusionAVNFH must not be overlooked in a new onset hip pain after COVID 19 infection. Our results show that corticosteroids administrated during the infection and the presence of hip joint effusion on ultrasound are especially suggestive for the development of osteonecrosis, as they were registered in all of our patients. The presence of these two factors necessitates patient referral for an MRI scan of the hips, in order that AVNFH be detected timely.References[1]Petek D, Hannouche D, Suva D. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: pathophysiology and current concepts of treatment. EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Mar 15;4(3):85-97.[2]Kerachian MA, Séguin C, Harvey EJ. Glucocorticoids in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a new understanding of the mechanisms of action. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2009 Apr;114(3-5):121-8.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosur of InterestsPLAMEN TODOROV Speakers bureau: speaker at national level for AbbVie, Novartis and UCB, Lily Mekenyan: None declared, Anastas Batalov Speakers bureau: Speaker at national level for AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, Stada, Elly Lilly.

Experiences of adult epilepsy patients with COVID-19 infections and vaccinations

Objective: To assess the course of COVID-19 infections and the tolerability of the mRNA vaccines of Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech and the viral vector vaccines from Astra Zeneca and Johnson & Johnson in adult patients with epilepsy (PWE). Method(s): From July 2020 to July 2021, we consecutively included adult outpatients with confirmed epilepsy. These PWE were interviewed about COVID-19 infections and vaccinations. Results of follow-up visits were added until the cut-off date (December 31, 2021). The data of COVID-19-infected without vaccinations or fully vaccinated PWE without COVID-19 infections were analyzed. Full vaccination was defined as a double vaccination with the Pfizer/BionTech, Moderna, or Astra Zeneca vaccines or a single Johnson & Johnson vaccination. Result(s): At cut-off, 612 of 1152 PWE fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 51 PWE had been infected without vaccination and 561 had full vaccination without infection. Among the infected PWE, 76.5% presented with symptoms;9.8% had a severe course (one death). The leading symptoms were influenza-like disorders (48.7% of infected PWE with symptoms), anosmia (28.2%), and ageusia (20.5%). Seizure increases or relapses after sustained seizure freedom occurred in 7.8%. Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 113 vaccinated PWE (20.1% of all vaccinated PWE). The leading AEs were fatigue, fever, and headache. The AE rate per vaccine was 14.0% for Pfizer/BionTech, 32.7% for Moderna, 25.8% for Astra Zeneca, and 46.2% for Johnson & Johnson. Of the AEs, 93.3% lasted <=1 week. Seizure increase or relapse occurred in 1.4% and was significantly less frequent than in the infected group (p= 0.0016). Conclusion(s): The course of COVID-19 infections and the tolerability of the vaccines were similar as in the general population, yet, seizure worsening occurred more often after the infection than after the vaccination.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, part of Springer Nature.

Endovascular Stent Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Lower Limb Arterial Thrombosis on the Background of COVID-19

AIM Analysis of the outcomes of endovascular stent thrombectomy in patients with acute arterial thrombosis of the lower extremities on the background of COVID-19. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study for the period from January 1, 2020 to March 1, 2022 included 34 patients with acute lower limb ischemia who were diagnosed with the novel coronavirus infection SARS-COV-2. Endovascular stent thrombectomy was performed according to the standard technique using a Destination 8F guiding sheath (Terumo), an Advantage 0.014" guidewire fTerumo), and a Casper stent (Microvention, Terumo) as a stent retriever. In case of fragmentation of thrombotic masses in the guide sheath, manual aspiration of thrombi was performed using a standard 50, 0 ml syringe. Self-expanding nitinol stents were implanted in 11 clinical cases. RESULTS Intraoperative bleeding from the puncture site of the artery developed in 14.7% of cases, which required additional manipulation to achieve hemostasis. Every tenth (11.8%) patient developed myocardial infarction, in 2.9% of cases - ischemic stroke. In the hospital postoperative period during the first hours after surgery, 26.5% of patients developed rethrombosis which required re-intervention. In 8.8% of cases, retrombectomy was unsuccessful, and limb amputation was performed. A fatal outcome occurred in 67.6% of cases, which was due to an increase in multiple organ failure and the development of sepsis. CONCLUSION Endovascular stent thrombectomy is characterized by a low risk of rethrombosis and amputation in the context of COVID-19. © 2023 Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine. All rights reserved.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF SERUM FERRITIN IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

BackgroundThe main systemic sclerosis (SSc) manifestations are skin thickening, microangiopathy and ischemic changes in tissues, fibrotic damage to the lungs, heart, kidneys, and digestive system, arthritis, and myopathy. Acute phase reactants (APR) like erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) reflect inflammation activity in various inflammatory conditions. Ferritin is a protein bound to iron;low serum ferritin indicates iron deficiency and/or anemia. Instead, high ferritin levels are associated with inflammatory and non-inflammatory conditions such as dermatomyositis, pulmonary fibrosis, lupus, systemic COVID-19, vasculitis, tissue damage, thromboembolic complications, and metastatic cancer. The possible role of ferritin in SSc as APR is unclear.ObjectivesWe aimed to assess whether ferritin levels can reflect the severity of SSc and predict the outcome.Methods241 files of SSc patients with information on serum ferritin level (ferritin over 300 mg/dL is considered elevated) who visited the Rambam Rheumatology Institute in the years 2004-2021were used for retrospective analysis. Patients' demographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and respiratory function data were collected from electronic hospital files. Statistics included Student's T-test, Pearson's chi-squared test, and Kaplan-Meier curve;statistical significance was determined as p<0.05.Results36 patients (FerEl-SSc) had elevated ferritin values;the rest (n=205) represented the second group (FerNor-SSc). Significant differences were seen in gender (male 44.4% - 15.6%), disease duration (4.56 - 7.7 years), modified Rodnan skin score (12.3 - 6.9), as well as in incidence of lung (65.7% - 38.7%), heart (51.4% - 21.1%), and renal (28.6% - 5.9%) involvement. Increased ferritin correlated with elevated ESR, CRP, creatinine, creatine kinase, troponin, and reduced hemoglobin, impaired pulmonary function tests and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiography. Patients with elevated ferritin had a significant increase in mortality rates (52.8% and 35.1%) and non-significant reduction in survival.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that ferritin has a potential as a sensitive marker for SSc severity in term of skin thickening, vital organ complications, and mortality. The ferritin test is simple and inexpensive, it can add to the complex SSc assessment and contribute to treatment decision-making in complicated SSc.REFERENCES:NIL.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Integrated Lactate Is Improved with a Novel Pharmacologic Inducer of the Endogenous Cytoprotective Heat Shock Protein 70I Gga and Potential COVID Applications

Introduction: Lactate is a common biomarker used in multiple surgical subspecialties. No one has previously measured coronary sinus lactate reduction as a result of drug administration. We therefore tested the hypothesis that IV geranylgeranylacetone (GGA), a novel agent used to treat human peptic ulcer disease, would result in reduced coronary sinus lactate production. Method(s): New Zealand adult rabbits (N=5 each) received IV 50 mg/kg GGA 24 hours before intervention, which consisted of Langendorff perfusion, 30 min of global normothermic cardioplegic arrest, followed by reperfusion. Myocardial release of lactate was measured. HSP70 was quantified by western blot. Differences between GGA+ and GGA- groups pre- and post-ischemia were analyzed by unpaired t-tests. Result(s): In the GGA- group, lactate increased immediately at one minute and throughout the duration of reperfusion. However, in GGA+ hearts, lactate also increased at one min of reperfusion but then continued to decrease throughout the remainder of reperfusion. Lactate was significantly less at every time point of reperfusion in GGA+. Integrated lactate area was significantly less throughout reperfusion in GGA+. Conclusion(s): GGA induced caused a marked decrease in coronary sinus lactate release during reperfusion. Simultaneously intravenously GGA induced myocardial HSP70i and reduced myocardial damage. Further study of the effects and mechanisms involved is indicated. Application to other organs is useful as well. Heat shock proteins (HSPS) are also antithrombotic. Given the thrombotic nature of Covid, induction of HSPS may be beneficial in decreasing the cardiac thoracic and vascular complications of Covid and allowing faster resolution of this disease during to vascular complications.

Hemophagocytosis in the Red Bone Marrow of Patients with Covid-19 with Sars-Cov-2 Infection

Red bone marrow samples investigation in deceased COVID-19 patients enabled to identify the phenomena of secondary hemophagocytosis. Analysis of the data showed that phagocytic reactions during infection of patients with SARS-CoV-2 are manifested both in relation to erythrocytes and leukocytes. The data obtained make it possible to expand the strategy of therapeutic measures, taking into account the new data on the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of COVID-19 in severe viral infection based on morphological findings and additional information on the involvement of young erythrocytes and lymphocytes in the structure of the red bone marrow in the cascade of pathological reactions. The results obtained confirm a wide range of aggressive damaging effects of SARS-CoV-2 in the development of multiple organ failure against the background of COVID-19 and the involvement of the red bone marrow in the pathological process. The authors supplemented information about the mechanisms of hypoxia in COVID-19, which is not only a consequence of damage to the respiratory epithelium, but also the result of damage to erythrocyte differons both at the level of red bone marrow and in peripheral blood. This fact must be taken into account in the development of a treatment strategy and in the creation of new drugs for the treatment of infected patients with various strains of SARS-CoV-2.

Major neurological syndromes with COVID-19: lessons to learn

Objective: Covid-19 is a highly infectious viral disease, and our understanding of the impact of this virus on the nervous system is limited. Therefore, we aimed to do a systematic analysis of the neurological manifestations. Methods: We retrospectively studied the clinical, laboratory, and radiological findings of patients with major neurological syndromes (MNS) in Covid-19 over 6 months. Results: We had 39 patients with major neurological syndromes (MNS). The most common MNS was cerebrovascular disease (CVD) (61.53%), in which ischemic stroke (83.33%), cortical sinus thrombosis (12.50%), and haemorrhagic stroke (4.16%) were seen. Among ischemic stroke patients, 50% had a large vessel occlusion, and 66.66% of patients with CVD had a significant residual disability. Cranial neuropathy (15.38%), GBS (10.26%), encephalitis (7.26%), and myelitis (5.12%) were the other MNS. Among the three encephalitis cases, two had CSF-Covid-19 PCR positivity and had severe manifestations and a poor outcome. Associated comorbidities included hypertension (30.76%), diabetes mellitus (12.82%), chronic kidney diseases (7.69%), and polycythaemia vera (2.56%). Lung involvement was seen in 64.1% of patients. Mortality was 17.94% in MNS with Covid-19. Conclusions: The most common major neurological syndrome associated with Covid-19 is CVD with increased frequency of large vessel occlusion causing significant morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous lung and other systemic involvement in MNS results in a deleterious outcome.

Surgical clinical characteristics of acute arterial thrombosis of the extremities in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection

Objective: To determine the clinical-surgical features of critical limb ischaemia (CLI) within the context of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Method(s): Cross-sectional, retrospective, observational, descriptive study, with clinical data obtained from printed and electronic records of patients with CLI treated by the Angiology and Vascular Surgery Service of the General Hospital of Mexico in the period between January 2020 and July 2021. Result(s): We evaluated the data of 33 patients with critical limb ischaemia of which 15 were positive for SARS-CoV-2 in the period from January 2020 to July 2021, females were the most affected representing the 53.3% of the total, patients under 60 years old accounted for 26.67%. Twenty-six percent of the patients presented critical limb ischaemia without having previous comorbidities, 60% of these presented with an advanced state of the disease and a delay in specialised medical care of more than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms, which warranted a major amputation in 37% of cases, the lower extremities represented 90% of the affected anatomical regions. Conclusion(s): the outcomes in our study show that the incidence of critical limb ischaemia during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic period occurred in an atypical way in a segment of young patients and without known event-generating comorbidities. Thromboembolic events, probably associated with the hypercoagulable state generated by this infection, also evolved rapidly and aggressively from the onset of symptoms despite prompt treatment.Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Medica del Hospital General de Mexico. Published by Permanyer.

EVALUATION OF TELENURSING FOLLOW-UP IN A COHORT OF STABLE/LOW DISEASE ACTIVITY PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIDES: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

BackgroundPeriodic follow-up (FU) is necessary for patients with Rheumatic Diseases (RDs). In the case of a stable clinical condition or low disease activity, FU can be carried out also by rheumatology nurses (RNs). Recent studies focusing on FUs led by RNs either in Rheumatology Clinics and with Telenursing (TN), showed promising results in terms of outcomes, cost reduction and users' satisfaction.ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of a Telenursing FU in a Rheumatology Centre in Florence, Italy.MethodsIn this pilot study, patients with stable inflammatory arthritis or low disease activity were contacted, after their first visit, through TN (T0) and then assessed during the following in-person visit (V12) by RNs for treatment adherence, for pain, for mental and physical health, for workability, for perception of disease activity and satisfaction concerning the TN service.ResultsOut of 27 interviewed patients, 59.3% (n=16/27) was affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), 18.5% (n=5/27) by Spondyloarthritis (AS), 14.8% (n=4/27) by Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and 7.4% (n=2/27) by Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. The mean age was 57.5±13.1 (M± DS) years and the treatment adherence level was optimal. 11.1% (n=3/27) of patients was referred for medical consultation because of the urgent clinical situation assessed by the RNs according to the clinical multidisciplinary checklist. After specialist consultation, 1 patient was revalued in presence for a transient ischemic attack;1 patient was contacted by the rheumatologist following independent discontinuation of methotrexate therapy;1 patient was redirected to urgent dermatology consultation because of a suspected cutaneous drug reaction.During the TN period (12 months), 33.3% (n=9/27) of the patients contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection and 11.1% (n=3/27) contracted urinary or upper respiratory tract infections.RA patients showed a mean Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease-RAID score of 2.4 at T0 and 2.5 at V12 (Range 0-10);AS patients showed a mean Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society-ASAS score of 0.3 in both periods and PsA showed a mean Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease-PSAID score of 0.7 and 0.8 at T0 and V12, respectively. Among RA, AS and PsA patients, as a pain score of 3 was recorded in both periods.In order to attend the in-person FU visit, 68.4% (n=13/19) of the patients took work leave. 37% (n=10/27) of them waited 40.9±18.6 minutes at V12 control. The average distance between the Rheumatology Centre and patients' home was 29.3±25.6 km. 15.4% (n=5/13) of the respondents did not own a car and 23.1% (n=3/13) was accompanied to visit by their caregiver.All the included patients expressed high satisfaction for the TN service, corresponding to 5 point Likert scale.ConclusionThe data show that TN FU is a valuable model for maintaining an adequate level of therapeutic adherence, reducing the travel time and working day loss, intercepting remotely clinical issues, as well as registering a high level of user acceptance and satisfaction. Further studies on larger samples are needed to confirm our findings.References[1] Bech B et al (2020) 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases;79:61-68. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215458.[2] Alcazar B, Ambrosio L. (2019) Tele-nursing in patients with chronic illness: a systematic review. An Sist Sanit Navar;42(2):187-197. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.0645.[3] Larsson I et al. (2013) Randomized controlled trial of a nurse-led rheumatology clinic for monitoring biological therapy. Journal of Advanced Nursing;70(1), 164–175., 2013 doi:10.1111/jan.12183Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Predictors of non-invasive ventilation failure in adult patients with cardiac dysfunction presenting with community-acquired pneumonia: an Egyptian multicenter prospective study

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) might be successful if carefully selected in adult patients with cardiac dysfunction presenting with community-acquired pneumonia. The main objective of this study was to identify the early predictors of NIV failure. Adult patients with left ventricle ejection fraction (LV EF) <50% admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with community-acquired pneumonia and acute respiratory failure were enrolled in this multicenter prospective study after obtaining informed consents (study registrationID: ISRCTN14641518). Non-invasive ventilation failure was defined as the requirement of intubation after initiation of NIV. All patients were assessed using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores at admission, while their Heart rate Acidosis Consciousness Oxygenation and Respiratory rate (HACOR) and lung ultrasound (LUS) scores in addition to blood lactate were assessed at NIV initiation and 12 and 24 hours later. A total of 177 patients were prospectively enrolled from February 2019 to July 2020. Of them, 53 (29.9%) had failed NIV. The mean age of the study cohort was 64.1+or- 12.6 years, with a male predominance (73.4%) and a mean LV EF of 36.4 +or- 7.8%. Almost 55.9% of the studied patients had diabetes mellitus, 45.8% had chronic systemic hypertension, 73.4% had ischemic heart disease, 20.3% had chronic kidney disease, and 9.6% had liver cirrhosis. No significant differences were observed between the NIV success and NIV failure groups regarding underlying morbidities or inflammatory markers. Patients who failed NIV were significantly older and had higher mean SOFA and APACHE II scores than those with successful NIV. We also found that NIV failure was associated with longer ICU stay (p < 0.001), higher SOFA scores at 48 hours (p < 0.001) and higher mortality (p < 0.001) compared with the NIV success group. In addition, SOFA (Odds Ratio (OR): 4.52, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 2.59-7.88, p < 0.001), HACOR (OR: 2.01, 95% CI: 0.97-4.18, p = 0.036) and LUS (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.014-1.106, p = 0.027) scores and blood lactate levels (OR: 9.35, 95% CI: 5.32-43.26, p < 0.001) were independent factors for NIV failure. High initial HACOR and SOFA scores, persistent hyperlactatemia and non-decrementing LUS score were associated with early NIV failure in patients with cardiac dysfunction presenting with community-acquired pneumonia, and could be used as clinical and paraclinical variables for early decision making regarding invasive ventilation.

Abdominal Aortic Occlusion in Setting of Covid-19

Introduction: The incidence of arterial thrombosis among critically ill patients with COVID-19 is 4.4%, acute aortic obstruction alone having a mortality rate of 31%. We present a review of the literature regarding isolated abdominal aortic thrombosis (IAAT) in the setting of COVID-19 infection, as well as a case presentation. Method(s): A literature review was performed using Pubmed with the keywords, aorta, aortic, thrombus, and Covid-19. Within these articles, the scope was narrowed to articles that related to IAAT in the setting of Covid-19 infection. Result(s): Our literature review found 9 articles detailing a total of 11 cases of IAAT in the setting of COVID-19 infection. IAAT had a mortality 22% (2 out of 9 patients). Approximately, 55% (6 out of 11) of the patients were treated with surgery and 27% (3 out of 11) received anticoagulation. 73%, (8 out of 11) of the patients in our literature review presented with symptoms of acute limb ischemia. Ages ranged from neonate to 85 years old, though 82% (9 out of 11) were over the age of 50. Conclusion(s): Our literature review suggests that IAAT is a serious complication of COVID-19 infection. IAAT is more common in males and people over the age of 50, which aligns with the 52 year- old male patient who presented to our clinic with lower extremity claudication and bilateral 1st & 5th toe cyanosis after COVID-19 infection. To prevent devastating limb ischemia, we emphasize early evaluation of claudication symptoms in patients with COVID-19 or recent COVID-19 infection.

SAFETY AND PHARMACOKINETICS OF IGPRO20 (SUBCUTANEOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN) AND IGPRO10 (INTRAVENOUS IMMUNOGLOBULIN) IN ADULTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (SSC) – RESULTS FROM A PHASE 2 TRIAL

BackgroundSystemic sclerosis (SSc) is a severe, progressive multisystem rheumatic disease with high mortality, but without approved disease-modifying treatment to stop or reverse course of disease. Intravenous immunoglobulin G (IgG) may have a positive impact on SSc based upon available literature reports. However, to date, there have been no clinical trials evaluating subcutaneous IgG (SCIG) in SSc. In particular, the impact of pathologically altered skin in SSc on local safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SCIG has not been explored yet.ObjectivesThe primary and secondary objectives of this trial (NCT04137224) included safety, including local infusion safety, and bioavailability of subcutaneous IgG (IgPro20) in adults with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc).MethodsThis was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Adult subjects with dcSSc diagnosis within 5 years from first non-Raynaud's phenomenon and modified Rodnan Skin Score of 15-45 at screening were randomized 1:1 to sequence A (IgPro20, 20% normal human subcutaneous immunoglobulin followed by IgPro10, 10% normal human intravenous immunoglobulin) or sequence B (IgPro10 followed by IgPro20). Each subject was to complete two treatment periods (16 weeks each), with up to 40 weeks (including screening) study duration for an individual subject. Doses received were 0.5g/kg/week split over two sessions for IgPro20, and 2g/kg/4 weeks split over 2-5 days for IgPro10. The primary endpoint was safety of IgPro20, described as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and changes in clinical observations.Results27 subjects were randomized, with 13 subjects to sequence A and 14 subjects to sequence B. In total, 25 subjects completed the study. Of 27 treated subjects, 107 TEAEs occurred in 22 subjects (81.5%) over the 36-week study period, the majority of which were mild or moderate. The most common TEAEs (>10% of subjects) by preferred term (PT) were headache (12 events occurring in 6 subjects [22.2%]), COVID-19 (3 events occurring in 3 subjects [11.1%]), diarrhoea (3 events occurring in 3 subjects [11.1%]), and vomiting (3 events occurring in 3 subjects [11.1%]).A total of 10 serious AEs (SAEs) were reported in 6 subjects (Viral infection, Chronic gastritis, Vomiting, Dehydration, Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, Chest pain, Myocardial infarction, Myocardial ischemia, Breast cancer, Interstitial lung disease). Among these, one subject experienced 2 SAEs (myocardial ischemia & myocardial infarction) and was discontinued from study treatment. None of the SAEs were considered related to study treatment by the investigator, and no deaths were reported.For IgPro20, 14 infusion site reactions (ISRs) occurred in 5 subjects (19.2%), all were mild or moderate in severity. The most common ISRs were infusion site pain and infusion site swelling (3 events in 2 subjects each, 7.7%). In total, 686 IgPro20 infusions were performed, resulting in an overall ISR rate per infusion of 0.02, ie 2 ISRs per 100 infusions. No ISRs were reported for IgPro10.No clinically relevant trends in vital signs, body weight, clinical laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, or pulmonary function tests were observed.PK profiles and bioavailability in dcSSc subjects were similar to those observed in other approved indications such as Primary Immunodeficiency. Population relative bioavailability of IgPro20, based on dose-normalized, baseline-corrected AUC0-tau was 0.761 (90% CI: 0.7033, 0.8232), ie 76.1% compared to IgPro10 (intravenous IgG).ConclusionThe overall safety profiles of IgPro20 and IgPro10 in subjects with dcSSc were consistent with that in approved indications such as CIDP, including a relatively low ISR rate for IgPro20. PK profiles and bioavailability were also similar to other indications. This study indicates that subcutaneous administration of IgPro20 has acceptable safety, bioavailability and PK profiles in patients with dcSSc. AcknowledgementsEditorial assistance was provided by Meridian HealthComms Ltd., funded by CSL Behring.Disclosure of InterestsChristopher P Denton Speakers bureau: Ja ssen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: GSK, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: GSK, CSL Behring, Inventiva, Horizon, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim and Novartis, Grant/research support from: Received congress support from Abbvie, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Medac, Susanna Proudman Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Marzena Olesińska Consultant of: AstraZeneca, Margitta Worm Consultant of: Novartis Pharma GmbH, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, DBV Technologies S.A, Aimmune Therapeutics UK Limited, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Leo Pharma GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH &Co.KG, ALK-Abelló Arzneimittel GmbH, Kymab Limited, Amgen GmbH, Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Pfizer Pharma GmbH, Mylan Germany GmbH (A Viatris Company), AstraZeneca GmbH, Lilly Deutschland GmbH and GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG., Nicoletta Del Papa Speakers bureau: Janssen Cilag, Boehringer Ingelheim., Marco Matucci-Cerinic Speakers bureau: Biogen, Sandoz, Boehringer Ingelheim, Consultant of: CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: MSD, Chemomab, Jana Radewonuk Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Jeanine Jochems Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Amgad Shebl Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Anna Krupa Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Jutta Hofmann Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring, Maria Gasior Shareholder of: CSL Behring, Employee of: CSL Behring.

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND EFFICACY OF DMARD USE IN GCA: RESULTS FROM THE PROSPECTIVE, LONGITUDINAL,MULTI-CENTRE HAS-GCA STUDY

BackgroundGCA is a critically ischemic large vessel vasculitis, varying in extent, severity and outcomes, hence requires disease stratification using clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters, for targeted management. Although DMARDs are used, the effectiveness in real life, such adjuvants remain un-elucidated. We performed a prospective, multi centre cohort study of new GCA stratified into remitting, relapsing, refractory, ischemic disease.ObjectivesWe assessed prognostic factors and compared critical outcomes such as remission with glucocorticoid (GC) monotherapy versus GC plus DMARDs in the first 12 months.MethodsHAS GCA study (1) recruited consecutive patients with new onset GCA from 7 centres (UK, Italy, Spain, Netherlands). diagnosis was confirmed used a modified GiACTA criteria at 6 months follow up. All underwent ultrasound (bilateral common, parietal, frontal temporal arteries, and axillary arteries) using accepted standard cut-off values [2]. GCA patients had US at baseline,1,3,6,12 months and halo count (HC) and Halo score (Temporal TAHS, axillary AAHS, total THS) assessed [3]. The primary outcome- remission at 12 months (absence of signs/symptoms, CRP<5 mg/dl, prednisolone < 5 mg daily). Results are reported as descriptive statistics.Results229 participants included in the study (GCA- 84 (36.68 %) (Figure 1). Study recruited during Covid pandemic,73 completed,11 lost to follow-up (died -7, withdrawn-4). The deceased/withdrawn patients (compared to completers) were older (80 v74 yrs, p=0.018), preponderantly male (73% v 36%, p=0.043) with visual symptoms (91% v 49%, p=0.010) partial/total sight loss (55% v 21%, p=0.024), lower CRP (21 v 68, p=0.061) and ESR (42 v 62, p= 0.317).Of 73 completers 36 required early DMARDs (<12 weeks) for refractory/relapsing/ischemic/GC related AEs. This group had more LV involvement (50% v 11%, p=0.0003), Remission attained at 12 months 32/36 (89%) in DMARD group was comparable to the remitting GC monotherapy group 33/37 (89%) with comparable cumulative GC doses (Figure 1, Table 1).At 12-months follow up, median TAHS, AAHS and THS reduced from 13 to 3, 12 to 9 and 21.5 to 12, respectively.ConclusionOur study suggests, elderly males with visual symptoms, sight loss, lower CRP are a high-risk group with increased mortality within GCA. Difficult to treat disease is seen in half of all patients especially with LV involvement. This group responds well to early DMARD use achieving remission comparable to the remitting group at 12 months. Current therapies fail to achieve remission in 9.5 % of cases. HS and HC show significant improvement mirroring clinical outcomes during first 12 months of therapy.References[1]Sebastian A et al. BMC Rheum. 2020[2]Schafer VS et al. Rheumatology 2017[3]van der Geest KSM et al. ARD 2020Table 1.comparison between the DMARD-used group and only GC group in all the GCA completed the 12 months follow upPatients' characteristicsGCA with completed follow-up (n=73)GCA treated with DMARD=36GCA not treated with DMARD=37Age, median (range) years73.5 (60-89)76 (60-89)Sex, Females, n (%)23 (64)24 (65)US halo score (HS)/IMT median (range)Temporal artery HS11 (0-23)13 (1-22)Axillary artery HS12 (0-21)12 (0-18)Axillary artery IMT (mm)0.77 (0.33-2.6)0.82 (0.39-1.21)Total HS22.5 (2-41)21 (5-40)Clinical features, n (%)Temporal headache25(69)30 (81)Scalp tenderness17 (47)19 (51)Jaw & Tongue claudication22 (61)24 (65)Polymyalgic symptoms21 (58)13 (35)Constitutional symptoms21 (58)18 (49)Any visual disturbance15 (42)21 (57)Partial or complete vision loss8 (22)7 (19)History of PMR6 (17)3 (8)Exam findings, n (%)Temporal artery abnormality24 (67)30 (81)AION/ CRAO8 (22)6 (16)Ocular nerve palsy1 (3)3 (8)Lab markers at baseline, median (range)CRP mg/dL,72.2 (6.4-292)59 (6-206)ESR mm/hr67 (9-130)57 (2-120)GC treatment, median (range)GC starting dose, (baseline)45 (0-60)50 (0-60)GC dose at 12m,5 (0-25)2.5 (0-10)Cumulative GC dose at 12m4627.5 (2600-10260.5)4622.5 (944-10737.5)Remission with prednisolone dose ≤5 mg at 12m, n (%)32 (89)33 (89)Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsBhaskar Dasgupta Consultant of: Roche, Chugai, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Roche, Sanofi, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline, Kornelis van der Geest Speakers bureau: Roche, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Alessandro Tomelleri: None declared, Pierluigi Macchioni: None declared, Giulia Klinowski: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Abdul Kayani: None declared, Mohammad Tariq: None declared, Diana Prieto-Peña: None declared, Edoardo Conticini: None declared, Muhammad Khurshid: None declared, Sue Inness: None declared, Jo Jackson: None declared, Alwin Sebastian: None declared.

A Case Series Analysis of Intestinal Ischemia in Covid- 19 Pandemic

Introduction: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has caused a global health crisis. Initially considered a respiratory tract pathogen, it can cause multiple organ dysfunction. It has also been described to predispose to venous and arterial thromboembolism;however, limited published data is available regarding mesenteric thrombosis COVID-19. Clinicians should be aware of the life-threatening situation in COVID-19 patients. Method(s): A case series analysis of 9 patients admitted and managed under department of operation over a duration of 13 months from September 2020 to September 2021 Results: Out of the total of 9 cases of intestinal ischemia, 3 were COVID-19 positive (rapid antigen, RT PCR or CORADS 4 or higher), overall mortality being 55.5% and patients with COVID- 19 were found to have 100% mortality in the study. Mortality in conservatively managed patients was 100%, Mortality in surgically managed patients was 42.8%. Pre operative acidosis, hypoxia and hypotension were found to be important determinants of outcome of the disease. Conclusion(s): Treatment of COVID - 19 and intestinal Ischemia should go simultaneously and in line with the latest evidence based guidelines of COVID 19, Patients who survive an acute event are likely to die of other complications related to the COVID-19 like ARDS, Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation etc that could have predisposed them to intestinal ischemia. Perioperative acidosis, hypoxia and hypotension are important determinants of the outcome of the course of the disease.

17th Annual Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Conference

The proceedings contain 115 papers. The topics discussed include: clinical and genetic predictors of sickle cell nephropathy in Malawi;clinicohematological characteristics of iron deficiency anemia and hemoglobinopathies in Pakistan;an experience of non-hospital based laboratory;assessment of hematological parameters of petrol filling workers at petrol stations in Ethiopia: a comparative cross-sectional study;burden and risk factor to acute myocardial ischemia in children with sickle cell anemia;dyslipidemia in transfusion-dependent-thalassemia patients and its correlation with serum vitamin D level;impact of COVID-19 pandemic to pre-transfusion hemoglobin level and frequency of transfusion in transfusion-dependent thalassemia patients in Indonesia;retinopathy in Egyptian patients with sickle cell disease;and dietary pattern, socio-demographic characteristics and nutritional status of pregnant women attending Barau Dikko teaching hospital and the need to develop recommended dietary allowance and dietary reference intakes for sickle cell disease patients.

OUTCOME FOR PATIENTS WITH GIANT CELL ARTERITIS (GCA) TREATED WITH TOCILIZUMAB ACCORDING TO NICE GUIDANCE IN A SINGLE TERTIARY UK CENTRE

BackgroundIn 2018 NICE and NHS England approved one year of weekly subcutaneous tocilizumab for use in relapsing or refractory GCA [1, 2]. During the COVID pandemic NHS England allowed extended use of tocilizumab in selected high risk patients [3]. This extension ended in March 2022. This has created a cohort of patients who are now no longer treated with tocilizumab and may be at risk of GCA flare. Currently, NHS England does not allow retreatment with tocilizumab.ObjectivesThis service evaluation used an intention-to-treat approach to retrospectively evaluate patients, who were ratified to receive tocilizumab for GCA according to the NICE guidance. We aimed to describe this cohort of patients for whom the use of tocilizumab had been approved, and their outcomes in terms of complications and disease control.Methods49 patients were ratified to receive tocilizumab between May 2019 and April 2022 by a specialist multidisciplinary team at a single tertiary rheumatology center. Their response was assessed in terms of relapse rates, steroid usage and complications as described below.Results80% of the 49 cohort of patients consisted of females (Table 1). 55% of patients were diagnosed with GCA on combination of clinical history, laboratory and temporal artery duplex findings. 94% (46/49) had at least a week's course of tocilizumab. Around half (51%) had relapsing disease. 6% had first dose as intravenous due to critical ischaemia. 27% (13/49) of patients developed complications whilst on treatment. Six developed cytopenia, 3 acquired infections and 4 stopped due to other reasons. As per guidelines, tocilizumab was stopped after 12 months in 25 patients (51%). 16% stopped treatment early due to complications. 18% had incomplete information. 10% had ongoing treatment. One patient died several months after finishing tocilizumab. 47% had methotrexate as DMARD therapy added prior to tocilizumab commencement (Figure 1). Out of 25 patients who completeted treatment, 24% (6/25) relapsed. 83% of these relapses were diagnosed on recurrence of symptoms and high inflammatory markers. In addition, 3 patients, who had tocilizumab suspended relapsed. 2/3 of these patients had treatment suspended due to infection. 5/9 relapse patients did not have preceding DMARD therapy. 22% (2/9) of relapse patients had PET-CT due to involvement of extra-cranial disease. 56% (5/9) relapsed following a median follow-up of 11 months. Of relapsed patients, seven were treated with increased dose of prednisolone and two patients received 6 months extension of tocilizumab with adequate tolerance and efficacy.ConclusionOur data shows good tolerability of tocilizumab and a 24% flare rate amongst patients who completed treatment. This is less than the 50% rate seen in GiACTA and other cohorts, where the majority of which occurred within 6 months of stopping treatment [4]. DMARD treatment may reduce relapse rate, but this will require further study. The data describing the efficacy of treatment beyond one year is limited [3]. However, with no established guidance for treating patients following tocilizumab, extension of treatment is a plausible option.References[1]Tocilizumab for treating giant cell arteritis, NICE Technology Appraisal Guidance, 18 April 2018. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta518/resources/tocilizumab-for-treating-giant-cell-arteritis-pdf-82606786726597[2]Stone J, Tuckwell K, Dimonaco S et al.Trial of Tocilizumab in Giant-Cell Arteritis. N Engl J Med 2017;377:317-328.[3]Regola F, Cerudelli E,Bosio G. Long-term treatment with tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis: efficacy and safety in a monocentric cohort of patients Rheumatology Adv Pract 2020;0:1–9.[4]Conway R, Putman MS, Mackie SL. Benchmarking tocilizumab use for giant cell arteritis. Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2022;6(2):rkac037.Figure 1.Table 1.GenderAge at time of diagnosisIndication for stopping treatmentMaleFemale50-5960-6970-7980-89Completed treatmentComplicationsOngoing treatmentIncomplete information18313162010251058Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Special Issue. (Special Issue.)

This special issue contains 13 articles that discuss public health articles such as public perception, knowledge and factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptability, determinants of enrolment in health insurance scheme among HIV patients, hypertension and associated factors among patients attending HIV clinic, determinants of visit-to-visit systolic blood pressure variability among Ghanaians with hypertension and diabetes mellitus, short-term outcomes among patients with subclinical hypothyroidism, association of erectile dysfunction with coronary artery disease, psychological correlates of COVID safety protocol adherence, ophthalmic services utilisation and associated factors, safe duration of silicon catheter replacement in urological patients, and leadership in health and medical education.

Arterial Thrombosis and Acute Limb Ischemia as a Complication of COVID-19 Infection.

COVID-19 refers to viral respiratory infections and is the predisposing factor for the development of venous and arterial thrombotic events due to a pronounced inflammatory response, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis. Recent studies have confirmed a high incidence of thromboembolic events, especially in the group of patients with severe coronavirus pneumonia. There have been an increasing number of reports of peripheral arterial thrombosis as well. Most cases of arterial thrombosis are noted in critical ill patients in intensive care setting. However, an increase of adverse arterial events was also noted in cases of asymptomatic or mild forms of COVID-19. Herein, we report a case of patient with asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, who developed a threatening lower limb ischemia. Our own clinical observation suggests that COVID-19-associated arterial thrombosis can be successfully treated by embolectomy, administration of in-hospital parenteral anticoagulation, and continuation of antithrombotic therapy with a "vascular" dose of rivaroxaban after discharge.

Ischemic stroke in the setting of supratherapeutic International Normalized Ratio following coronavirus disease 2019 infection: a case report.

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-19 infection is associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events. We present a case of acute middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke in a patient with SARS-CoV-19 infection despite being on warfarin with supratherapeutic INR (International Normalized Ratio). CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old Caucasian female with multiple comorbidities was admitted to the hospital with symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection. A rapid antigen test confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, and intravenous remdesivir was initiated. On the fifth day of admission, the patient experienced sudden onset confusion, slurred speech, left-sided hemiplegia, right-sided eye deviation, and left-sided facial droop. Imaging studies revealed an occlusion of the distal anterior M2 segment of the right middle cerebral artery, and an MRI of the brain confirmed an acute right MCA infarction. Notably, the patient was receiving warfarin therapy with a supratherapeutic INR of 3.2. CONCLUSIONS: This case report highlights the potential for thromboembolic events, including stroke, in patients with COVID-19 infection, even when receiving therapeutic anticoagulation therapy. Healthcare providers should be vigilant for signs of thrombosis in COVID-19 patients, particularly those with pre-existing risk factors. Further research is necessary to understand the pathophysiology and optimal management of thrombotic complications in COVID-19 patients.